Audi A5 2011 vs Mercedes CLS 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLS is a more dynamic driving. Audi A5 engine produces 61 HP less power than Mercedes CLS, whereas torque is 220 NM less than Mercedes CLS. Due to the lower power, Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A5 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS, which means that by driving the Audi A5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A5 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes CLS) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Mercedes CLS 2010 3.0 engine: The Mercedes-Benz OM642 is a 3.0-liter V6 diesel widely used in many models under the 3.0 CDI or 350 CDI designation. It is known for strong performance and good durability when maintained properly, and well-kept engines are capable of exceeding 500,000 km. At the same time, the unit has several characteristic weak ... More about Mercedes CLS 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Audi A5 is smaller. Audi A5 is 31 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLS, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A5 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
829 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Audi A5 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A5 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |