Audi A5 2011 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Audi A5) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Camaro) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 323 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi A5 engine produces 119 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, but torque is 122 NM more than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Audi A5 is smaller, but slightly higher. Audi A5 is 21 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A5 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
829 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi A5 has 91 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |