Audi A5 2011 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 328 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. Audi A5 engine produces 117 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Due to the lower power, Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 10.9 | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi A5 consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Audi A5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Audi A5 is smaller, but slightly higher. Audi A5 is 21 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A5 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
829 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi A5 has 91 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |