Audi A5 2009 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009

 
Audi A5
2009 - 2011
Volkswagen Polo
2009 - 2014
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.0 Diesel1.6 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 240 HP90 HP
Torque: 500 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.1 seconds11.5 seconds
Audi A5 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A5 engine produces 150 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 270 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.64.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km4.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A5 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A5 could require 360 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A5 consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1250 km on highway
760 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A5 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A4, Audi Q5Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3, Skoda Fabia, Skoda Roomster
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Polo might be a better choice in this respect.
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ...  More about Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m3.97 m
Width: 1.85 m1.68 m
Height: 1.39 m1.49 m
Audi A5 is larger, but lower.
Audi A5 is 74 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 17 cm wider, while the height of Audi A5 is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
980 litres952 litres
Audi A5 has more luggage capacity.
Audi A5 has 200 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A5 (by 28 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 metersno data
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 2`250no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Audi A5 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Audi A5, so Audi A5 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 90003800
Rating in user reviews: 9.0/10 6.4/10
Pros and Cons: Audi A5 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volkswagen Polo has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv