Audi A5 2011 vs Nissan Pulsar 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 211 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 165 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Audi A5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A5 engine produces 96 HP more power than Nissan Pulsar, whereas torque is 185 NM more than Nissan Pulsar. Thanks to more power Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
The Nissan Pulsar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A5 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A5 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A5 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.71 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.52 m | |
Audi A5 is larger, but lower. Audi A5 is 33 cm longer than the Nissan Pulsar, 9 cm wider, while the height of Audi A5 is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 385 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A5 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Pulsar, which means Audi A5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | average | |
Average price (€): | 14 000 | 6800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Nissan Pulsar has
| |