Audi A5 2011 vs Mazda 3 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Audi A5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A5 engine produces 61 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.2 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 3 2013 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 3 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Audi A5 is larger, but lower. Audi A5 is 25 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi A5 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1263 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A5 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Audi A5 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 3, so Audi A5 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |