Audi A5 2011 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Audi A5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A5 engine produces 12 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.8 | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi A5 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Audi A5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Audi A5 is larger, but lower. Audi A5 is 24 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi A5 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1334 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A5 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Audi A5 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 3, so Audi A5 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |