Audi A5 2019 vs Skoda Rapid 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Audi A5) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Skoda Rapid) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Audi A5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A5 engine produces 53 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 225 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.1 | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi A5 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that by driving the Audi A5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Audi A5 is larger, but lower. Audi A5 is 25 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 14 cm wider, while the height of Audi A5 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1280 litres | 1460 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Audi A5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 180 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`120 kg | 1`695 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`525 kg | 1`235 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 595 kg | 460 kg | |
| Audi A5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Skoda Rapid. Therefore, Audi A5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |