Audi A5 2019 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Audi A5) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Camaro) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 275 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. Audi A5 engine produces 85 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 9.2 | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi A5 consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Audi A5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 705 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Audi A5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Audi A5 is smaller, but slightly higher. Audi A5 is 9 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A5 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 257 litres | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi A5 has 193 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A5 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |