Audi A5 2008 vs BMW 6 series 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 286 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 580 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
BMW 6 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi A5 engine produces 116 HP less power than BMW 6 series, whereas torque is 230 NM less than BMW 6 series. Due to the lower power, Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A5 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series, which means that by driving the Audi A5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A5 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
1470 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
920 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Audi A5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 6 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A5 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Seat Altea, Audi Q5, Seat Leon, Seat Exeo | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 6 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
BMW 6 sērija 2007 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering strong performance, the ... More about BMW 6 sērija 2007 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
Audi A5 is smaller. Audi A5 is 20 cm shorter than the BMW 6 series, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
829 litres | no data | |
Audi A5 has 5 litres more trunk space than the BMW 6 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`975 | 2`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7400 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |