Audi A5 2016 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audi A5 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Camaro has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Audi A5 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 3.6 - 6.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 252 HP | 315 - 430 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 - 400 NM | 370 - 556 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 8.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.3 | 10.6 - 11.0 | |
|
Audi A5 petrol engines consumes on average 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Audi A5 is smaller, but slightly higher. Audi A5 is 16 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`213 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |