Audi A2 2000 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 72 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 104 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Audi A2 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A2 engine produces 3 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Audi A2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A2 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that by driving the Audi A2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A2 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Fabia | Used also on Chevrolet Kalos | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi A2 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.49 m | |
| Audi A2 is 5 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A2 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 175 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1085 litres | 980 litres | |
|
Audi A2 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Chevrolet Aveo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A2 (by 105 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A2 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Audi A2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`435 kg | 1`445 kg | |
| Net weight: | 995 kg | 990 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 440 kg | 455 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A2 has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |