Audi A2 2000 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 - 110 HP | 55 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 - 230 NM | 106 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 14.8 seconds | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.9 - 5.9 | 4.5 - 7.4 | |
|
Audi A2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Audi A2 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.46 m | |
| Audi A2 is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A2 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1085 litres | 1030 litres | |
|
Audi A2 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi A2 has 120 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A2 (by 55 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A2 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`452 | ~ 1`530 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A2 has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |