Audi A1 2012 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Audi A1 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A1 engine produces 54 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 107 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Audi A1 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A1 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A1 could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A1 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A1 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Yeti | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi A1 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Audi A1 2012 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Audi A1 is larger, but lower. Audi A1 is 54 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 13 cm wider, while the height of Audi A1 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 751 litres | |
|
Audi A1 has more luggage capacity. Audi A1 has 128 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A1 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Audi A1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Audi A1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Audi A1, so Audi A1 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A1 has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |