Audi A1 2014 vs Nissan Micra 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Audi A1 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A1 and Nissan Micra have the same engine power, but Audi A1 torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Micra. Audi A1 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 3.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi A1 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Audi A1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi A1 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Micra 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Nissan Micra 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi A1 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A1 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
920 litres | 1004 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Audi A1 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 84 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A1 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Audi A1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Audi A1, so Audi A1 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A1 has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |