Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2022 vs Volvo XC90 2024
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Alfa Romeo Stelvio) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Volvo XC90) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Alfa Romeo Stelvio engine produces 100 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 70 NM more than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 1.6 l/100km + 20.4 kWh/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 11.60 € | 9.00 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/lPetrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is smaller. Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 25 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 262 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 262 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 525 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1600 litres | 1816 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 216 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`410 kg | 2`950 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`745 kg | 2`222 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 665 kg | 728 kg | |
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Volvo XC90. Therefore, Volvo XC90 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |