Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2024
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is a more dynamic driving. Alfa Romeo Stelvio engine produces 43 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, but torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Kodiaq. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 6.6 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo Stelvio consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo Stelvio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 7 cm shorter than the Skoda Kodiaq, 4 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 845 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo Stelvio has 320 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 41 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |