Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Stelvio and Mazda CX-5 have the same engine power, but Alfa Romeo Stelvio torque is 70 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Alfa Romeo Stelvio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.5 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo Stelvio consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo Stelvio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is larger. Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 14 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 494 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1608 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has more luggage capacity. Alfa Romeo Stelvio has 31 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Alfa Romeo Stelvio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`143 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |