Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Alfa Romeo Stelvio engine produces 30 HP less power than Jaguar F-Pace, but torque is 20 NM more than Jaguar F-Pace. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo Stelvio consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo Stelvio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo Stelvio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is smaller, but slightly higher. Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 4 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Pace, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 650 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Jaguar F-Pace may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Alfa Romeo Stelvio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`460 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Jaguar F-Pace scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 400 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |