Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Stelvio engine produces 3 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo Stelvio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.6 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo Stelvio consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo Stelvio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo Stelvio has 25 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Alfa Romeo Stelvio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 33 800 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |