Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Stelvio engine produces 90 HP more power than Volvo XC60, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo Stelvio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo Stelvio consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo Stelvio consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017: The Active Transfer Case (ATC) can transfer up to 50 percent of engine torque to the front wheels by monitoring grip conditions and driver input. Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is smaller, but slightly higher. Alfa Romeo Stelvio and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1432 litres | |
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 39 200 | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |