Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Alfa Romeo Stelvio) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Stelvio engine produces 150 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo Stelvio reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo Stelvio consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo Stelvio consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has 4x4: The Active Transfer Case (ATC) can transfer up to 50 percent of engine torque to the front wheels by monitoring grip conditions and driver input. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo Stelvio has 25 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Alfa Romeo Stelvio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 34 200 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |