Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 vs Suzuki Swift 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Suzuki Swift has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Suzuki Swift can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Alfa Romeo Stelvio also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 1.2 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 510 HP | 70 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 - 600 NM | 116 - 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.8 - 8.8 seconds | 10 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 9.8 | 4.6 - 6.5 | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift. On average, Alfa Romeo Stelvio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is larger. Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 99 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 21 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 562 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has more luggage capacity. Alfa Romeo Stelvio has 312 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 2.3 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Alfa Romeo Stelvio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`300 | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 39 200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |