Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-5 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-5 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Alfa Romeo Stelvio also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 510 HP | 155 - 194 HP | |
Torque: | 330 - 600 NM | 196 - 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.8 - 8.8 seconds | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 9.8 | 5.8 - 7.2 | |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, Alfa Romeo Stelvio equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.69 m | 4.55 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is larger. Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 14 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 506 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has 19 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Alfa Romeo Stelvio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`300 | ~ 2`085 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 39 200 | 24 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |