Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-5 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-5 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Alfa Romeo Stelvio also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 510 HP | 150 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 - 600 NM | 196 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.8 - 8.8 seconds | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| In general, Alfa Romeo Stelvio are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda CX-5. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 9.0 | 5.5 - 9.4 | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, Alfa Romeo Stelvio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 190 - 193 mm (7.5 - 7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Alfa Romeo Stelvio can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is larger. Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 14 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 875 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1688 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Alfa Romeo Stelvio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Alfa Romeo Stelvio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`300 kg | ~ 2`090 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`678 kg | ~ 1`567 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 622 kg | ~ 523 kg | |
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Alfa Romeo Stelvio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 20 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |