Alfa Romeo Spider 2002 vs SAAB 9-3 1998

 
Alfa Romeo Spider
2002 - 2003
SAAB 9-3
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 150 HP130 HP
Torque: 181 NM177 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds11 seconds
Alfa Romeo Spider is more dynamic to drive.
Alfa Romeo Spider engine produces 20 HP more power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 4 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo Spider reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.29.4
Alfa Romeo Spider consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo Spider over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway970 km on highway
Alfa Romeo Spider gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a SAAB 9-3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo 147Installed on at least 2 other car models, including SAAB 9000, SAAB 900
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Alfa Romeo Spider might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.63 m
Width: 1.78 m1.71 m
Height: 1.32 m1.43 m
Alfa Romeo Spider is 35 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 7 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Spider is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 110 litres295 litres
SAAB 9-3 has more luggage space.
Alfa Romeo Spider has 185 litres less trunk space than the SAAB 9-3.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Spider is 1.2 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Alfa Romeo Spider can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6301`790
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 70002600
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo Spider has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
SAAB 9-3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv