Alfa Romeo Spider 2001 vs Volvo C70 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Alfa Romeo Spider engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 49 NM less than Volvo C70. Despite less power, Alfa Romeo Spider reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.7 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Spider is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo Spider consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo Spider over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo Spider gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Spider is smaller. Alfa Romeo Spider is 44 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo Spider is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 110 litres | 262 litres | |
|
Volvo C70 has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo Spider has 152 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Spider is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Alfa Romeo Spider can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Spider has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |