Alfa Romeo Spider 2001 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Alfa Romeo Spider engine produces 43 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 124 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 12.4 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Spider is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo Spider consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo Spider over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo Spider gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo Spider) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Spider is smaller, but slightly higher. Alfa Romeo Spider is 63 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo Spider is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 110 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Spider is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Alfa Romeo Spider can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Spider has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |