Alfa Romeo Spider 1995 vs Rover 200 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 192 HP | 103 - 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 - 260 NM | 127 - 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 8.4 seconds | 8.9 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 - 11.2 | 7.1 - 8.5 | |
|
Alfa Romeo Spider petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Spider is larger, but lower. Alfa Romeo Spider is 6 cm longer than the Rover 200, 10 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Spider is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 110 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo Spider has 190 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo Spider uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Spider is 0.7 metres more than that of the Rover 200, which means Alfa Romeo Spider can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`655 | ~ 1`565 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 200 has
| |