Alfa Romeo MiTo 2010 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo MiTo engine produces 95 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 131 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo MiTo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo MiTo could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is larger, but lower. Alfa Romeo MiTo is 14 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo MiTo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
950 litres | no data | |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |