Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 vs Seat Ibiza 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 206 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo MiTo engine produces 35 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 74 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo MiTo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo MiTo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo MiTo and Seat Ibiza are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 938 litres | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo MiTo has 22 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`526 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |