Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 206 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo MiTo engine produces 45 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 87 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo MiTo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo MiTo could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Fiat Bravo, Alfa Romeo Giulietta | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Alfa Romeo MiTo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Alfa Romeo MiTo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is larger, but lower. Alfa Romeo MiTo is 14 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo MiTo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 250 litres | |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |