Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 vs Seat Ibiza 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo and Seat Ibiza have the same engine power, but Alfa Romeo MiTo torque is 10 NM less than Seat Ibiza. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
| By specification Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo MiTo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo MiTo is 3 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 284 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
684 litres | 938 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo MiTo has 14 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo MiTo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Ibiza (by 254 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`601 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |