Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo and Renault Clio have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Alfa Romeo MiTo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 3.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo MiTo could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo MiTo and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
684 litres | 1146 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo MiTo has 30 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 462 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Clio, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`658 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |