Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo MiTo engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 81 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo MiTo reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Alfa Romeo MiTo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo MiTo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Alfa Romeo MiTo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is larger, but lower. Alfa Romeo MiTo is 14 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo MiTo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
684 litres | no data | |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |