Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 vs Ford Fusion 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo MiTo engine produces 22 HP more power than Ford Fusion, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford Fusion. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo MiTo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
| By specification Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo MiTo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.53 m | |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo is 4 cm longer than the Ford Fusion, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo MiTo is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
684 litres | 1175 litres | |
|
Ford Fusion has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Alfa Romeo MiTo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fusion (by 491 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Fusion, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`640 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford Fusion has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Ford Fusion, so Ford Fusion quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |