Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo MiTo engine produces 18 HP more power than Volvo V40, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo MiTo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo MiTo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is smaller, but slightly higher. Alfa Romeo MiTo is 31 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo MiTo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo MiTo has 54 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`650 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |