Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo engine produces 17 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V40. Despite less power, Alfa Romeo MiTo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 62 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is smaller, but slightly higher. Alfa Romeo MiTo is 31 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo MiTo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo MiTo has 54 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |