Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Alfa Romeo MiTo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volvo V40) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Alfa Romeo MiTo engine produces 72 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo MiTo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 5.9 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo MiTo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo MiTo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo MiTo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is smaller, but slightly higher. Alfa Romeo MiTo is 31 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo MiTo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo MiTo has 54 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`630 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |