Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Alfa Romeo MiTo engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Clio, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo MiTo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 3.2 | |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo MiTo could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo MiTo and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1146 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo MiTo has 30 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Renault Clio, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`630 kg | 1`658 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Clio has
| |