Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 vs Mazda 2 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 78 - 170 HP | 75 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 320 NM | 119 - 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 12 seconds | 10.4 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 6.5 | 5.1 - 5.8 | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is larger, but lower. Alfa Romeo MiTo is 14 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo MiTo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
950 litres | no data | |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`629 | ~ 1`457 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |