Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.4 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 78 - 170 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 - 250 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 5.6 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Alfa Romeo MiTo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is smaller, but slightly higher. Alfa Romeo MiTo is 31 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo MiTo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo MiTo has 65 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`620 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |