Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 vs Ford Fiesta 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 0.9 - 1.4 | 1.0 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 78 - 170 HP | 70 - 140 HP | |
Torque: | 115 - 250 NM | 110 - 215 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13 seconds | 9 - 14.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 5.6 | 3.5 - 5.2 | |
Alfa Romeo MiTo petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Alfa Romeo MiTo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.06 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo MiTo is 2 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo MiTo is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 303 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 984 litres | |
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo MiTo has 33 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo MiTo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 1.2 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`620 | ~ 1`656 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 9400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |