Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 vs Hyundai i20 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 0.9 - 1.4 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 78 - 170 HP | 75 - 120 HP | |
Torque: | 115 - 250 NM | 122 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13 seconds | 10.2 - 16 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 5.6 | 3.2 - 6.7 | |
Alfa Romeo MiTo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai i20. On average, Alfa Romeo MiTo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.06 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo MiTo is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai i20, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo MiTo is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 326 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1042 litres | |
Hyundai i20 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo MiTo has 56 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i20. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo MiTo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 1.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai i20, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`620 | ~ 1`624 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Hyundai i20 has
| |