Alfa Romeo Giulietta 2010 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulietta is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Giulietta engine produces 60 HP more power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Nissan Juke. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo Giulietta reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Alfa Romeo Giulietta consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo Giulietta over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Alfa Romeo Giulietta consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1460 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Alfa Romeo Giulietta gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulietta is larger, but lower. Alfa Romeo Giulietta is 22 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 3 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Giulietta is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulietta has more luggage capacity. Alfa Romeo Giulietta has 99 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`825 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Alfa Romeo Giulietta scores higher in safety tests. The Alfa Romeo Giulietta scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo Giulietta has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulietta has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |