Alfa Romeo Giulietta 2014 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 175 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 206 - 380 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 11.3 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 6.4 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulietta petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Alfa Romeo Giulietta equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo Giulietta is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo Giulietta is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Alfa Romeo Giulietta has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Giulietta is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`809 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |