Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs Toyota Corolla 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Giulia engine produces 388 HP more power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 443 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo Giulia reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.3 | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo Giulia consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo Giulia could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Corolla) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo Giulia) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo Giulia is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 10 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Giulia is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 452 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Toyota Corolla scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |