Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs Volvo S60 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Alfa Romeo Giulia) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Volvo S60) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 415 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia engine produces 95 HP more power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Volvo S60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo S60 2018: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 442 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo S60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 30 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |