Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs BMW 3 series 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo Giulia is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Giulia engine produces 64 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 120 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo Giulia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 57 litres | |
950 km with real consumption | 1050 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
Alfa Romeo Giulia is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo Giulia is 2 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`374 | 1`970 | |
Safety: | |||
BMW 3 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 3 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 29 200 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |