Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs Volvo S60 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 450 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo Giulia is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Giulia engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo S60, but torque is 50 NM more than Volvo S60. Despite less power, Alfa Romeo Giulia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The Alfa Romeo Giulia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo Giulia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo Giulia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo Giulia consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 67 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1550 km in combined cycle | |
1650 km on highway | 1810 km on highway | ||
920 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | no data | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1749 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 2`060 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 29 200 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |