Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs Skoda Superb 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Giulia engine produces 30 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo Giulia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
| By specification Alfa Romeo Giulia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo Giulia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1490 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Skoda Superb) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo Giulia) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia is 22 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo Giulia is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 625 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Superb scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |